Restrictions on definiteness in second language acquisition
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Second language acquisition of definiteness restrictions
The role of UG in generative linguistics Generative linguistics is essentially the exploration of the properties of UG. Current conceptions of UG take it to be comprised of: Principles of representation, computation, and interface with language-external systems. Parameters of variation between languages affecting particularly aspects of representation and computation. Acquisition “device” of so...
متن کاملThe Role of Sociolinguistics in Second Language Acquisition
Learning a new language also involves learning a broad system of norms for social relations.This study broadly showed how EFL learners’ speech act is conveyed from their nativecultures when they are communicating in English and demonstrated that there are somepossibilities of cross-cultural misunderstanding when interlocutors are engaged in the speechact of complimenting with native speakers of...
متن کاملA Dynamical System Approach to Research in Second Language Acquisition
Epistemologically speaking, second language acquisition research (SLAR) might be reconsidered from a complex dynamical system view with interconnected aspects in the ecosystem of language acquisition. The present paper attempts to introduce the tenets of complex system theory and its application in SLAR. It has been suggested that the present dominant traditions in language acquisition research...
متن کاملTowards a definition of intake in second language acquisition
Intake is a concept that has long fascinated second language researchers as it provides a window onto the crucial intermediary stage between input and acquisition. A better understanding of this intermediary stage can help us to distinguish between input that is used for immediate (e.g. communicative) purposes only and input that is drawn on for learning. This articl...
متن کاملSecond Language Acquisition
Speaking a second language (L2) means having acquired a new inventory of phonemes (speech sounds), new words, and new inflectional and syntactic rules. Because this new knowledge must be stored somewhere in the brain, it does not require neuroimaging experiments to conclude that a bilingual speaker’s brain must be in some way different from that of a monolingual speaker. The question is rather:...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
سال: 2012
ISSN: 1879-9264,1879-9272
DOI: 10.1075/lab.2.1.03whi